UFT vs Selenium: Difference Between Selenium and HP UFT
In this Selenium vs UFT tutorial, we are going to compare very popular automation tools - QTP vs Selenium. This QTP Selenium comparison tutorial covers key difference between Selenium and QTP. Selenium and UFT/QTP have relative advantages over each other. You should remember that there is no best tool as such. Comparing UFT vs Selenium, you need to select the best tool for your requirement/project.
Difference between Selenium and UFT
Following is the main difference between UFT and Selenium:
|HP UFT (QTP)||Selenium|
|It is commercial tool by Micro Focus and hence it requires a license and is expensive||Its an open source testing tool hence it does not require license and is free|
|It is used for testing client-server applications. It can test web- based as well as desktop applications||Using Selenium only web applications can be automated|
|QTP tests can only be developed in QTP IDE||Selenium has the option of using wide range of IDEs like Visual Studio, Eclipse, Netbeans|
|HP UFT only supports VB script||Selenium supports JAVA, .NET, Ruby, Perl, PHP, and many other programming languages|
|HP UFT comes with built in object repository. Object repository development and maintenance is quite easy in HP ALM||Selenium dose not have such built in object repository, but object can be managed by using UI element user extension|
|HP UFT integrates with test management tool like HP Quality Center||There is no such tool that integrates with Selenium|
|All types of dialog box is supported by UFT Testing||It supports dialog box partially|
|It supports different environments like SAP, Oracle, .NET but user need to purchase add-on license for them||It supports addition of plug-ins to include features that are not provided by core Selenium|
|Automation testing is expensive due to licensing cost||Web automation testing with Selenium incurs less cost|
|HP QTP offers very good technical support||It has no official support, since it is an open source|
|HP QTP supports only VBScript . Hence Object Oriented Approach to Test Automation becomes challenging||Selenium supports mature Object Oriented Language like Java|
|HP QTP is more user friendly and scripts are developed quickly.||It is a low level tool with less functionality. Script requires more time to develop and maintain|
|Backward compatibility is powerful. Latest version of HP ALM supports code that was developed 5 years back||With new Selenium release the API changes. So Test Scripts need to be updated|
- Selenium is an open-source testing tool and it doesn’t require a license whereas HP UFT is a commercial tool by Micro Focus and hence it requires a license.
- Selenium supports JAVA, .NET, Ruby, Perl, PHP, and many other programming languages whereas HP UFT only supports VB script.
- Selenium is a low-level tool with less functionality while HP UFT is more user-friendly and scripts are developed quickly.
- Selenium offers web automation testing at less cost whereas, in HP UFT, automation testing is expensive.
- Selenium is used for web applications automation but HP UFT is used for any client-server applications.